A way to understand humanity's global meta-crisis
It's how we think
Every culture develops and functions, mostly unconsciously, according to a socially-constructed set of myths, beliefs, values, assumptions and related cultural norms. This fabricated framework constitutes that culture’s operating paradigm or ‘worldview’. Members of a particular society acquire their culture-specific worldview simply by growing up in their uniquely delimited socio-cultural context.
Modern techno-industrial society’s dominant worldview reflects the values of industrial capitalism – including, paradoxically, socialist and communist versions – and its hand-maiden neoliberal economic thinking. This worldview springs from belief in human exceptionalism, the notion that humans are not part of the natural world nor beholden to biophysical laws; that human ingenuity (technological innovation) can solve any resource or ecological problem. Consistent with this mythic construct, mainstream economics assumes the economy is a self-generating separate and independent system; it contains no useful information about the biophysical environment within which the economy operates in the real world. It is just a small step from there to the prevailing belief that the modern human enterprise need not be constrained by biophysical limits and that infinite growth on a finite planet is possible.
To help understand our contemporary dilemma and the likely outcome, it is useful to think of any cultural world-view as a complex set of memes. Evolutionary biologist, Richard Dawkins, coined the term ‘meme’ – a nugget of cultural information – as a cultural parallel to biological genes – nuggets of biological information. The important point is that memes, like genes, are subject to natural selection – memes can be ‘selected out’ by their environments should they become maladaptive.
People should realize that a made-up social construct may not contain a good ‘map’ of biophysical reality. This begs a crucial question: Does our current global cultural worldview ‘map’ well to the natural world – think: climate chaos, ocean acidification, plunging biodiversity, micro-plastic contamination, falling sperm counts, pollution of everything, etc.? Obviously not. I therefore argue that MTI culture’s simplistic, growth-dependent, anthropocentric, exceptionalist framing of reality has become maladaptive in an increasingly chaotic eco-cultural environment of its own making.
In short, MTI societies are in danger of being ‘selected out’. Collapse or a least a ‘great simplification’ is inevitable – and by some accounts already underway.

I remember it really hitting home during COVID how the most aggressive form of a virus tends not to survive because it kills its host before it can find another one.
Seems like a silly risk to take, but human nature seems such that we may not find our restraint without causing even more serious problems.
Do you think it’s possible? Some days I’d like to think so, other days feel hopeless.